<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>galaxy camera wifi only &#8211; Gadget Unit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gadgetunit.com/tag/galaxy-camera-wifi-only/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gadgetunit.com</link>
	<description>Tech for the rest of us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:14:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.16</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Samsung announces Galaxy Camera without cellular capabilities</title>
		<link>http://gadgetunit.com/2013/02/20/samsung-announces-galaxy-camera-without-cellular-capabilities/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Post]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galaxy camera wifi only]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetunit.com/?p=1292</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Samsung received much criticism for the high price-point of its Android smartphone + camera device, dubbed the &#8220;Galaxy Camera,&#8221; but now it seems as though Samsung is taking a step back and offering the whole quad-core camera package, but without a cellular antenna. It features the same 4.8-inch HD display with Android 4.1 Jelly Bean [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
